Praxis Arqueológica https://praxis.uahurtado.cl/index.php/pa <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Praxis Arqueológica</strong> es una revista científica electrónica, cuyas contribuciones, anonimizadas, son revisadas por pares evaluadores, de manera de asegurar la calidad de los trabajos. De esta forma, la revista es un espacio de discusión que sigue criterios consensuados por la academia para la debida publicación de trabajos arqueológicos. Se aceptarán manuscritos en castellano e inglés. La revista es editada por el <a href="http://antropologia.uahurtado.cl/"><strong>Departamento de Antropología</strong> </a>de la Universidad Alberto Hurtado (Chile). El <strong><a href="https://praxis.uahurtado.cl/index.php/pa/about/editorialTeam">Comité Editorial</a></strong> de la revista está compuesto por un grupo de investigadoras e investigadores con destacadas trayectorias, que actualmente trabajan en prestigiosas instituciones de Chile y el extranjero.</p> <p>Esperamos con esta revista contribuir al desarrollo de la disciplina arqueológica, abriendo un espacio para la publicación del creciente número de estudios producidos dentro de las&nbsp;diversas instancias en las que se desarrolla actualmente la arqueología, tanto en Chile como en el extranjero. Nuestra meta es constituir a <strong>Praxis Arqueológica</strong> en un referente en la publicación de casos de estudios arqueológicos, incluyendo prospecciones, excavaciones, análisis de laboratorio, estudios etnoarqueológicos y patrimoniales, entre otros.</p> <p>Las y los invitamos a participar de este nuevo espacio. En la sección ‘<strong><a href="https://praxis.uahurtado.cl/index.php/pa/informacion-para-autores">Información para autores</a></strong>’ podrán encontrar los requisitos formales para el envío de sus manuscritos.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Los Editores</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Departamento de Antropología, Universidad Alberto Hurtado es-ES Praxis Arqueológica 2452-5081 Old and Novel Roads in a New Era: Archaeology of the Anthropocene in the South https://praxis.uahurtado.cl/index.php/pa/article/view/28 <p>In this essay we seek to contribute to current debates on the Anthropocene, setting our reflections in a dialogue with the approaches proposed by the three papers selected by the Editorial Committee. We review these articles taking into account how they are related to the demarcation perspective, predominant in geology, and from which archeology cannot be absent. We then focus on the temporal and spatial scales involved, the theoretical and epistemological approaches proposed, and the role that archeology may play in the definition of a concept that is intended to be transdisciplinary. Finally, we consider that it is necessary to build more robust and fluid bridges between the different approaches that study the Anthropocene, including the social and historical sciences, in a transdisciplinary way. Likewise, it is necessary to build bridges between scientific perspectives and critical philosophical and political positions elaborated from and situated in the Global South. Archaeology, laying at the intersection of social, natural and historical sciences, should have a central role in this process.</p> Mariana Mondini A. Sebastián Muñoz Vivian Scheinsohn ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2023-07-27 2023-07-27 4 1 1 7 10.53689/pa.v4i1.28 Anthropocene: The Deconstruction of the Concept https://praxis.uahurtado.cl/index.php/pa/article/view/29 <p>We present a critical essay on some current positions on the scope of the Anthropocene concept developed two decades ago. Two recent articles are discussed that coincide in ignoring the original definition, admitting that it is possible to syndicate different agents at different times as part of the Anthropocene, opening the possibility that any human evidence can be part of this process. According to our argument, this makes irrelevant the idea of the existence of an Anthropocene in the environmental history of the earth and its implications for the present and the future.</p> Luis Cornejo B. ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2023-04-18 2023-04-18 4 1 8 11 10.53689/pa.v4i1.29 Animitas as Material Manifestation of Popular Religiosity: Study of Cenotaphs in Santiago https://praxis.uahurtado.cl/index.php/pa/article/view/31 <p>This work consists of the study of animitas, which are built in the urban spaces of the city of Santiago, as a material manifestation of Latin American popular religiosity. For this purpose, two cases that shocked public opinion will be taken: the animitas of the victims Marina Silva and Hans Pozo. The study of this construction aims to know and to describe a material shape of popular religion that is experienced daily in urban spaces of Santiago, emphasizing its materiality and its ritual practices. Through the ethnoarchaeology, it is analyzed a spiritual experience outside the normative and institutionalized cult and its mixture with secular and modern elements, understanding that popular religiosity is a space that is based on the syncretism of religious beliefs and experiences that give world’s meaning to individual. The animita is a cenotaph that is born of human agency by a death in public space, but also would have the capacity to act in the world, because it has a powerful symbolic effectiveness, being a mediator between the invisible and the visible, it would transform the reality of those who pray.</p> Richard Armijo ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2023-11-24 2023-11-24 4 1 12 31 10.53689/pa.v4i1.31